commit acb0d7ebac81a36ed6ce1fd01a392302aa675791
parent 90f3b667aad43b21adbbbe29204e9b317130b49d
Author: SomberNight <somber.night@protonmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 01:53:34 +0200
lnchannel: better checks for "update_add_htlc"
I believe this now implements all the checks listed in BOLT-02 for
update_add_htlc, however, the BOLT is sometimes ambiguous,
and actually the checks listed there IMO are insufficient.
There are still some TODOs, in part because of the above.
Diffstat:
4 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
diff --git a/electrum/lnchannel.py b/electrum/lnchannel.py
@@ -49,9 +49,10 @@ from .lnutil import (Outpoint, LocalConfig, RemoteConfig, Keypair, OnlyPubkeyKey
make_htlc_tx_with_open_channel, make_commitment, make_received_htlc, make_offered_htlc,
HTLC_TIMEOUT_WEIGHT, HTLC_SUCCESS_WEIGHT, extract_ctn_from_tx_and_chan, UpdateAddHtlc,
funding_output_script, SENT, RECEIVED, LOCAL, REMOTE, HTLCOwner, make_commitment_outputs,
- ScriptHtlc, PaymentFailure, calc_onchain_fees, RemoteMisbehaving, make_htlc_output_witness_script,
+ ScriptHtlc, PaymentFailure, calc_fees_for_commitment_tx, RemoteMisbehaving, make_htlc_output_witness_script,
ShortChannelID, map_htlcs_to_ctx_output_idxs, LNPeerAddr, BarePaymentAttemptLog,
- LN_MAX_HTLC_VALUE_MSAT)
+ LN_MAX_HTLC_VALUE_MSAT, fee_for_htlc_output, offered_htlc_trim_threshold_sat,
+ received_htlc_trim_threshold_sat)
from .lnsweep import create_sweeptxs_for_our_ctx, create_sweeptxs_for_their_ctx
from .lnsweep import create_sweeptx_for_their_revoked_htlc, SweepInfo
from .lnhtlc import HTLCManager
@@ -141,7 +142,7 @@ class Channel(Logger):
self.sweep_address = sweep_address
self.storage = state
self.db_lock = self.storage.db.lock if self.storage.db else threading.RLock()
- self.config = {}
+ self.config = {} # type: Dict[HTLCOwner, lnutil.Config]
self.config[LOCAL] = state["local_config"]
self.config[REMOTE] = state["remote_config"]
self.channel_id = bfh(state["channel_id"])
@@ -420,9 +421,11 @@ class Channel(Logger):
"""Raises PaymentFailure if the htlc_proposer cannot add this new HTLC.
(this is relevant both for forwarding and endpoint)
"""
- # TODO check if this method uses correct ctns (should use "latest" + 1)
- # TODO review all these checks... e.g. shouldn't we check both parties' ctx sometimes?
htlc_receiver = htlc_proposer.inverted()
+ # note: all these tests are about the *receiver's* *next* commitment transaction,
+ # and the constraints are the ones imposed by their config
+ ctn = self.get_next_ctn(htlc_receiver)
+ chan_config = self.config[htlc_receiver]
if self.is_closed():
raise PaymentFailure('Channel closed')
if self.get_state() != channel_states.OPEN:
@@ -432,23 +435,42 @@ class Channel(Logger):
raise PaymentFailure('Channel cannot send ctx updates')
if not self.can_send_update_add_htlc():
raise PaymentFailure('Channel cannot add htlc')
+
+ # If proposer is LOCAL we apply stricter checks as that is behaviour we can control.
+ # This should lead to fewer disagreements (i.e. channels failing).
+ strict = (htlc_proposer == LOCAL)
+
+ # check htlc raw value
if amount_msat <= 0:
- raise PaymentFailure("HTLC value cannot must be >= 0")
- if self.available_to_spend(htlc_proposer) < amount_msat:
- raise PaymentFailure(f'Not enough local balance. Have: {self.available_to_spend(htlc_proposer)}, Need: {amount_msat}')
- if len(self.hm.htlcs(htlc_proposer)) + 1 > self.config[htlc_receiver].max_accepted_htlcs:
- raise PaymentFailure('Too many HTLCs already in channel')
- current_htlc_sum = (htlcsum(self.hm.htlcs_by_direction(htlc_proposer, SENT).values())
- + htlcsum(self.hm.htlcs_by_direction(htlc_proposer, RECEIVED).values()))
- if current_htlc_sum + amount_msat > self.config[htlc_receiver].max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat:
- raise PaymentFailure(f'HTLC value sum (sum of pending htlcs: {current_htlc_sum/1000} sat '
- f'plus new htlc: {amount_msat/1000} sat) '
- f'would exceed max allowed: {self.config[htlc_receiver].max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat/1000} sat')
- if amount_msat < self.config[htlc_receiver].htlc_minimum_msat:
+ raise PaymentFailure("HTLC value must be positive")
+ if amount_msat < chan_config.htlc_minimum_msat:
raise PaymentFailure(f'HTLC value too small: {amount_msat} msat')
if amount_msat > LN_MAX_HTLC_VALUE_MSAT and not self._ignore_max_htlc_value:
raise PaymentFailure(f"HTLC value over protocol maximum: {amount_msat} > {LN_MAX_HTLC_VALUE_MSAT} msat")
+ # check proposer can afford htlc
+ max_can_send_msat = self.available_to_spend(htlc_proposer, strict=strict)
+ if max_can_send_msat < amount_msat:
+ raise PaymentFailure(f'Not enough balance. can send: {max_can_send_msat}, tried: {amount_msat}')
+
+ # check "max_accepted_htlcs"
+ # this is the loose check BOLT-02 specifies:
+ if len(self.hm.htlcs_by_direction(htlc_receiver, direction=RECEIVED, ctn=ctn)) + 1 > chan_config.max_accepted_htlcs:
+ raise PaymentFailure('Too many HTLCs already in channel')
+ # however, c-lightning is a lot stricter, so extra checks:
+ if strict:
+ max_concurrent_htlcs = min(self.config[htlc_proposer].max_accepted_htlcs,
+ self.config[htlc_receiver].max_accepted_htlcs)
+ if len(self.hm.htlcs(htlc_receiver, ctn=ctn)) + 1 > max_concurrent_htlcs:
+ raise PaymentFailure('Too many HTLCs already in channel')
+
+ # check "max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat"
+ current_htlc_sum = htlcsum(self.hm.htlcs_by_direction(htlc_receiver, direction=RECEIVED, ctn=ctn).values())
+ if current_htlc_sum + amount_msat > chan_config.max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat:
+ raise PaymentFailure(f'HTLC value sum (sum of pending htlcs: {current_htlc_sum/1000} sat '
+ f'plus new htlc: {amount_msat/1000} sat) '
+ f'would exceed max allowed: {chan_config.max_htlc_value_in_flight_msat/1000} sat')
+
def can_pay(self, amount_msat: int, *, check_frozen=False) -> bool:
"""Returns whether we can add an HTLC of given value."""
if check_frozen and self.is_frozen_for_sending():
@@ -678,15 +700,8 @@ class Channel(Logger):
self.lnworker.payment_failed(self, htlc.payment_hash, payment_attempt)
def balance(self, whose: HTLCOwner, *, ctx_owner=HTLCOwner.LOCAL, ctn: int = None) -> int:
- """
- This balance in mSAT is not including reserve and fees.
- So a node cannot actually use its whole balance.
- But this number is simple, since it is derived simply
- from the initial balance, and the value of settled HTLCs.
- Note that it does not decrease once an HTLC is added,
- failed or fulfilled, since the balance change is only
- committed to later when the respective commitment
- transaction has been revoked.
+ """This balance (in msat) only considers HTLCs that have been settled by ctn.
+ It disregards reserve, fees, and pending HTLCs (in both directions).
"""
assert type(whose) is HTLCOwner
initial = self.config[whose].initial_msat
@@ -697,8 +712,7 @@ class Channel(Logger):
def balance_minus_outgoing_htlcs(self, whose: HTLCOwner, *, ctx_owner: HTLCOwner = HTLCOwner.LOCAL,
ctn: int = None):
- """
- This balance in mSAT, which includes the value of
+ """This balance (in msat), which includes the value of
pending outgoing HTLCs, is used in the UI.
"""
assert type(whose) is HTLCOwner
@@ -716,27 +730,62 @@ class Channel(Logger):
ctn = self.get_next_ctn(ctx_owner)
return htlcsum(self.hm.htlcs_by_direction(ctx_owner, direction, ctn).values())
- def available_to_spend(self, subject: HTLCOwner) -> int:
+ def available_to_spend(self, subject: HTLCOwner, *, strict: bool = True) -> int:
+ """The usable balance of 'subject' in msat, after taking reserve and fees into
+ consideration. Note that fees (and hence the result) fluctuate even without user interaction.
"""
- This balance in mSAT, while technically correct, can
- not be used in the UI cause it fluctuates (commit fee)
- """
- # FIXME whose balance? whose ctx?
- # FIXME confusing/mixing ctns (should probably use latest_ctn + 1; not oldest_unrevoked + 1)
assert type(subject) is HTLCOwner
- ctx_owner = subject.inverted()
+ sender = subject
+ receiver = subject.inverted()
+ ctx_owner = receiver
+ # TODO but what about the other ctx? BOLT-02 only talks about checking the receiver's ctx,
+ # however the channel reserve is only meaningful if we also check the sender's ctx!
+ # in particular, note that dust limits can be different between the parties!
+ # but due to the racy nature of this, we cannot be sure exactly what the sender's
+ # next ctx will look like (e.g. what feerate it will use). hmmm :/
ctn = self.get_next_ctn(ctx_owner)
- balance = self.balance_minus_outgoing_htlcs(whose=subject, ctx_owner=ctx_owner, ctn=ctn)
- reserve = self.config[-subject].reserve_sat * 1000
- # TODO should we include a potential new htlc, when we are called from receive_htlc?
- fees = calc_onchain_fees(
- num_htlcs=len(self.included_htlcs(ctx_owner, SENT, ctn=ctn) + self.included_htlcs(ctx_owner, RECEIVED, ctn=ctn)),
- feerate=self.get_feerate(ctx_owner, ctn=ctn),
+ sender_balance_msat = self.balance_minus_outgoing_htlcs(whose=sender, ctx_owner=ctx_owner, ctn=ctn)
+ receiver_balance_msat = self.balance_minus_outgoing_htlcs(whose=receiver, ctx_owner=ctx_owner, ctn=ctn)
+ sender_reserve_msat = self.config[receiver].reserve_sat * 1000
+ receiver_reserve_msat = self.config[sender].reserve_sat * 1000
+ initiator = LOCAL if self.constraints.is_initiator else REMOTE
+ # the initiator/funder pays on-chain fees
+ num_htlcs_in_ctx = len(self.included_htlcs(ctx_owner, SENT, ctn=ctn) + self.included_htlcs(ctx_owner, RECEIVED, ctn=ctn))
+ feerate = self.get_feerate(ctx_owner, ctn=ctn)
+ ctx_fees_msat = calc_fees_for_commitment_tx(
+ num_htlcs=num_htlcs_in_ctx,
+ feerate=feerate,
is_local_initiator=self.constraints.is_initiator,
- )[subject]
- return balance - reserve - fees
+ round_to_sat=False,
+ )
+ # note: if this supposed new HTLC is large enough to create an output, the initiator needs to pay for that too
+ # note: if sender != initiator, both the sender and the receiver need to "afford" the payment
+ htlc_fee_msat = fee_for_htlc_output(feerate=feerate)
+ # TODO stuck channels. extra funder reserve? "fee spike buffer" (maybe only if "strict")
+ # see https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/issues/728
+ # note: in terms of on-chain outputs, as we are considering the htlc_receiver's ctx, this is a "received" HTLC
+ htlc_trim_threshold_msat = received_htlc_trim_threshold_sat(dust_limit_sat=self.config[receiver].dust_limit_sat, feerate=feerate) * 1000
+ if strict:
+ # also consider the other ctx, where the trim threshold is different
+ # note: the 'feerate' we use is not technically correct but we have no way
+ # of knowing the actual future feerate ahead of time (this is a protocol bug)
+ htlc_trim_threshold_msat = min(htlc_trim_threshold_msat,
+ offered_htlc_trim_threshold_sat(dust_limit_sat=self.config[sender].dust_limit_sat, feerate=feerate) * 1000)
+ max_send_msat = sender_balance_msat - sender_reserve_msat - ctx_fees_msat[sender]
+ if max_send_msat < htlc_trim_threshold_msat:
+ # there will be no corresponding HTLC output
+ return max_send_msat
+ if sender == initiator:
+ max_send_after_htlc_fee_msat = max_send_msat - htlc_fee_msat
+ max_send_msat = max(htlc_trim_threshold_msat - 1, max_send_after_htlc_fee_msat)
+ return max_send_msat
+ else:
+ # the receiver is the initiator, so they need to be able to pay tx fees
+ if receiver_balance_msat - receiver_reserve_msat - ctx_fees_msat[receiver] - htlc_fee_msat < 0:
+ max_send_msat = htlc_trim_threshold_msat - 1
+ return max_send_msat
- def included_htlcs(self, subject, direction, ctn=None):
+ def included_htlcs(self, subject: HTLCOwner, direction: Direction, ctn: int = None) -> Sequence[UpdateAddHtlc]:
"""
return filter of non-dust htlcs for subjects commitment transaction, initiated by given party
"""
@@ -747,12 +796,11 @@ class Channel(Logger):
feerate = self.get_feerate(subject, ctn)
conf = self.config[subject]
if direction == RECEIVED:
- weight = HTLC_SUCCESS_WEIGHT
+ threshold_sat = received_htlc_trim_threshold_sat(dust_limit_sat=conf.dust_limit_sat, feerate=feerate)
else:
- weight = HTLC_TIMEOUT_WEIGHT
+ threshold_sat = offered_htlc_trim_threshold_sat(dust_limit_sat=conf.dust_limit_sat, feerate=feerate)
htlcs = self.hm.htlcs_by_direction(subject, direction, ctn=ctn).values()
- htlc_value_after_fees = lambda htlc: htlc.amount_msat // 1000 - (weight * feerate // 1000)
- return list(filter(lambda htlc: htlc_value_after_fees(htlc) >= conf.dust_limit_sat, htlcs))
+ return list(filter(lambda htlc: htlc.amount_msat // 1000 >= threshold_sat, htlcs))
def get_secret_and_point(self, subject: HTLCOwner, ctn: int) -> Tuple[Optional[bytes], bytes]:
assert type(subject) is HTLCOwner
@@ -877,6 +925,8 @@ class Channel(Logger):
# feerate uses sat/kw
if self.constraints.is_initiator != from_us:
raise Exception(f"Cannot update_fee: wrong initiator. us: {from_us}")
+ # TODO check that funder can afford the new on-chain fees (+ channel reserve)
+ # (maybe check both ctxs, at least if from_us is True??)
with self.db_lock:
if from_us:
assert self.can_send_ctx_updates(), f"cannot update channel. {self.get_state()!r} {self.peer_state!r}"
@@ -917,11 +967,19 @@ class Channel(Logger):
cltv_expiry=htlc.cltv_expiry), htlc))
# note: maybe flip initiator here for fee purposes, we want LOCAL and REMOTE
# in the resulting dict to correspond to the to_local and to_remote *outputs* of the ctx
- onchain_fees = calc_onchain_fees(
+ onchain_fees = calc_fees_for_commitment_tx(
num_htlcs=len(htlcs),
feerate=feerate,
is_local_initiator=self.constraints.is_initiator == (subject == LOCAL),
)
+
+ # TODO: we need to also include the respective channel reserves here, but not at the
+ # beginning of the channel lifecycle when the reserve might not be met yet
+ if remote_msat - onchain_fees[REMOTE] < 0:
+ raise Exception(f"negative remote_msat in make_commitment: {remote_msat}")
+ if local_msat - onchain_fees[LOCAL] < 0:
+ raise Exception(f"negative local_msat in make_commitment: {local_msat}")
+
if self.is_static_remotekey_enabled():
payment_pubkey = other_config.payment_basepoint.pubkey
else:
diff --git a/electrum/lnutil.py b/electrum/lnutil.py
@@ -30,8 +30,11 @@ if TYPE_CHECKING:
from .lnonion import OnionRoutingFailureMessage
+# defined in BOLT-03:
HTLC_TIMEOUT_WEIGHT = 663
HTLC_SUCCESS_WEIGHT = 703
+COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT = 724
+HTLC_OUTPUT_WEIGHT = 172
LN_MAX_FUNDING_SAT = pow(2, 24) - 1
LN_MAX_HTLC_VALUE_MSAT = pow(2, 32) - 1
@@ -93,7 +96,7 @@ class FeeUpdate(StoredObject):
@attr.s
class ChannelConstraints(StoredObject):
capacity = attr.ib(type=int)
- is_initiator = attr.ib(type=bool)
+ is_initiator = attr.ib(type=bool) # note: sometimes also called "funder"
funding_txn_minimum_depth = attr.ib(type=int)
@@ -558,12 +561,39 @@ def make_commitment_outputs(*, fees_per_participant: Mapping[HTLCOwner, int], lo
return htlc_outputs, c_outputs_filtered
-def calc_onchain_fees(*, num_htlcs: int, feerate: int, is_local_initiator: bool) -> Dict['HTLCOwner', int]:
+def offered_htlc_trim_threshold_sat(*, dust_limit_sat: int, feerate: int) -> int:
+ # offered htlcs strictly below this amount will be trimmed (from ctx).
+ # feerate is in sat/kw
+ # returns value in sat
+ weight = HTLC_TIMEOUT_WEIGHT
+ return dust_limit_sat + weight * feerate // 1000
+
+
+def received_htlc_trim_threshold_sat(*, dust_limit_sat: int, feerate: int) -> int:
+ # received htlcs strictly below this amount will be trimmed (from ctx).
+ # feerate is in sat/kw
+ # returns value in sat
+ weight = HTLC_SUCCESS_WEIGHT
+ return dust_limit_sat + weight * feerate // 1000
+
+
+def fee_for_htlc_output(*, feerate: int) -> int:
+ # feerate is in sat/kw
+ # returns fee in msat
+ return feerate * HTLC_OUTPUT_WEIGHT
+
+
+def calc_fees_for_commitment_tx(*, num_htlcs: int, feerate: int,
+ is_local_initiator: bool, round_to_sat: bool = True) -> Dict['HTLCOwner', int]:
# feerate is in sat/kw
# returns fees in msats
- overall_weight = 500 + 172 * num_htlcs + 224
+ # note: BOLT-02 specifies that msat fees need to be rounded down to sat.
+ # However, the rounding needs to happen for the total fees, so if the return value
+ # is to be used as part of additional fee calculation then rounding should be done after that.
+ overall_weight = COMMITMENT_TX_WEIGHT + num_htlcs * HTLC_OUTPUT_WEIGHT
fee = feerate * overall_weight
- fee = fee // 1000 * 1000
+ if round_to_sat:
+ fee = fee // 1000 * 1000
return {
LOCAL: fee if is_local_initiator else 0,
REMOTE: fee if not is_local_initiator else 0,
diff --git a/electrum/tests/test_lnchannel.py b/electrum/tests/test_lnchannel.py
@@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ class TestChannel(ElectrumTestCase):
class TestAvailableToSpend(ElectrumTestCase):
def test_DesyncHTLCs(self):
alice_channel, bob_channel = create_test_channels()
- self.assertEqual(499995656000, alice_channel.available_to_spend(LOCAL))
+ self.assertEqual(499994624000, alice_channel.available_to_spend(LOCAL))
self.assertEqual(500000000000, bob_channel.available_to_spend(LOCAL))
paymentPreimage = b"\x01" * 32
@@ -626,13 +626,13 @@ class TestAvailableToSpend(ElectrumTestCase):
alice_idx = alice_channel.add_htlc(htlc_dict).htlc_id
bob_idx = bob_channel.receive_htlc(htlc_dict).htlc_id
- self.assertEqual(89994624000, alice_channel.available_to_spend(LOCAL))
+ self.assertEqual(89993592000, alice_channel.available_to_spend(LOCAL))
self.assertEqual(500000000000, bob_channel.available_to_spend(LOCAL))
force_state_transition(alice_channel, bob_channel)
bob_channel.fail_htlc(bob_idx)
alice_channel.receive_fail_htlc(alice_idx, error_bytes=None)
- self.assertEqual(89994624000, alice_channel.available_to_spend(LOCAL))
+ self.assertEqual(89993592000, alice_channel.available_to_spend(LOCAL))
self.assertEqual(500000000000, bob_channel.available_to_spend(LOCAL))
# Alice now has gotten all her original balance (5 BTC) back, however,
# adding a new HTLC at this point SHOULD fail, since if she adds the
@@ -652,7 +652,7 @@ class TestAvailableToSpend(ElectrumTestCase):
# Now do a state transition, which will ACK the FailHTLC, making Alice
# able to add the new HTLC.
force_state_transition(alice_channel, bob_channel)
- self.assertEqual(499995656000, alice_channel.available_to_spend(LOCAL))
+ self.assertEqual(499994624000, alice_channel.available_to_spend(LOCAL))
self.assertEqual(500000000000, bob_channel.available_to_spend(LOCAL))
alice_channel.add_htlc(htlc_dict)
diff --git a/electrum/tests/test_lnutil.py b/electrum/tests/test_lnutil.py
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ from electrum.lnutil import (RevocationStore, get_per_commitment_secret_from_see
make_htlc_tx_inputs, secret_to_pubkey, derive_blinded_pubkey, derive_privkey,
derive_pubkey, make_htlc_tx, extract_ctn_from_tx, UnableToDeriveSecret,
get_compressed_pubkey_from_bech32, split_host_port, ConnStringFormatError,
- ScriptHtlc, extract_nodeid, calc_onchain_fees, UpdateAddHtlc)
+ ScriptHtlc, extract_nodeid, calc_fees_for_commitment_tx, UpdateAddHtlc)
from electrum.util import bh2u, bfh, MyEncoder
from electrum.transaction import Transaction, PartialTransaction
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ class TestLNUtil(ElectrumTestCase):
local_revocation_pubkey, local_delayedpubkey, local_delay,
funding_tx_id, funding_output_index, funding_amount_satoshi,
to_local_msat, to_remote_msat, local_dust_limit_satoshi,
- calc_onchain_fees(num_htlcs=len(htlcs), feerate=local_feerate_per_kw, is_local_initiator=True), htlcs=htlcs)
+ calc_fees_for_commitment_tx(num_htlcs=len(htlcs), feerate=local_feerate_per_kw, is_local_initiator=True), htlcs=htlcs)
self.sign_and_insert_remote_sig(our_commit_tx, remote_funding_pubkey, remote_signature, local_funding_pubkey, local_funding_privkey)
self.assertEqual(str(our_commit_tx), output_commit_tx)
@@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ class TestLNUtil(ElectrumTestCase):
local_revocation_pubkey, local_delayedpubkey, local_delay,
funding_tx_id, funding_output_index, funding_amount_satoshi,
to_local_msat, to_remote_msat, local_dust_limit_satoshi,
- calc_onchain_fees(num_htlcs=0, feerate=local_feerate_per_kw, is_local_initiator=True), htlcs=[])
+ calc_fees_for_commitment_tx(num_htlcs=0, feerate=local_feerate_per_kw, is_local_initiator=True), htlcs=[])
self.sign_and_insert_remote_sig(our_commit_tx, remote_funding_pubkey, remote_signature, local_funding_pubkey, local_funding_privkey)
self.assertEqual(str(our_commit_tx), output_commit_tx)
@@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ class TestLNUtil(ElectrumTestCase):
local_revocation_pubkey, local_delayedpubkey, local_delay,
funding_tx_id, funding_output_index, funding_amount_satoshi,
to_local_msat, to_remote_msat, local_dust_limit_satoshi,
- calc_onchain_fees(num_htlcs=0, feerate=local_feerate_per_kw, is_local_initiator=True), htlcs=[])
+ calc_fees_for_commitment_tx(num_htlcs=0, feerate=local_feerate_per_kw, is_local_initiator=True), htlcs=[])
self.sign_and_insert_remote_sig(our_commit_tx, remote_funding_pubkey, remote_signature, local_funding_pubkey, local_funding_privkey)
self.assertEqual(str(our_commit_tx), output_commit_tx)
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ class TestLNUtil(ElectrumTestCase):
local_revocation_pubkey, local_delayedpubkey, local_delay,
funding_tx_id, funding_output_index, funding_amount_satoshi,
to_local_msat, to_remote_msat, local_dust_limit_satoshi,
- calc_onchain_fees(num_htlcs=0, feerate=local_feerate_per_kw, is_local_initiator=True), htlcs=[])
+ calc_fees_for_commitment_tx(num_htlcs=0, feerate=local_feerate_per_kw, is_local_initiator=True), htlcs=[])
self.sign_and_insert_remote_sig(our_commit_tx, remote_funding_pubkey, remote_signature, local_funding_pubkey, local_funding_privkey)
ref_commit_tx_str = '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'
self.assertEqual(str(our_commit_tx), ref_commit_tx_str)
